>>11650>And what has changed significantly?nothing as far as I can tell. I'm sure it has for some people, but where I am and have been, not much of anything.
>I wouldn't really call it annexation, but rather union.A union would be more like the formation of the UK - the creation of a new country out of two or more other entities. In this case, the USA wouldn't become something that isn't the USA if it annexed Greenland.
>Not really. Greenland is self-governing (autonomy) internally but not externally.On paper, sure, but the notion that Denmark in any way controls the destinies of the people of Greenland is kind of funny.
>Why not?because it doesn't solve the issue people have with the existence of Israel on or within what used to all be Palestine.
>Let me guess. Do you think it's Iran?No, I don't have a strong opinion on the matter. Suggesting it's Israel as you did isn't unreasonable, in a sort of chicken and egg manner.
>I heard there are some problems with Hispanics. You mean as far as people being deported? I'm not sure what you mean.